Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Vietnam is rapidly becoming one of the fastest growing economies in Asia, are you looking at the market opportunities?


One of the fastest-growing economies in Asia, Vietnam is a dynamic and vibrant place to do business. Vietnam is the 13thmost populous country in the world with a population close to 90 million; 60% of whom are under the age of 35. Over the past ten years, economic growth has been second only to China, averaging about 7.5 per cent per year since 2001. Vietnam’s GDP has been doubling every ten years since 1986!

Vietnam is one of Australia’s top 10 trading partners in Asia with two-way trade valued at A$6.2 billion in 2009-10. Vietnam presents significant market opportunities for Australian Exporters. Some of the key business opportunities for Australian companies are in:

  • Building and construction
  • Clean energy
  • Health expertise
  • Goods and services
  • ICT 


Interestingly, Vietnam is the world’s second fastest growing ICT market, with growth estimated at 20-25 per cent annually!

The international business projects, managed by the Discipline of International Business at the University of Sydney Business School in conjunction with the Export Council of Australia can give you the opportunity to engage with a postgraduate student to undertake rigorous market research into the opportunities for your business to expand into the Vietnamese market.

If you are interested in looking at this rapidly growing market and you are a member of the ECA, do not miss out on this fabulous opportunity.  Please contact Lisa McAuley by the end of April and put your company forward to receive a tailored market research project.

If you are a business member of the Export Council of Australia and are interested in participating in the 2013 program, please e-mail Lisa McAuley on lisamcauley@export.org.au and provide the following information:

• Company name:
• Contact details:
• Market project:
• Company overview:



 Thank you!

Australia’s Asian Century – Business Can Turn Vision Into Reality


- Cynthia Dearrin- Dearin & Associates
Last October, the Government released a much-anticipated ‘White Paper’ setting out its vision for how Australia can “tak[e] advantage of the opportunities offered by the Asian Century” (footnote 1 -http://www.pm.gov.au/press-office/australia-asian-century-white-paper-australias-roadmap-navigating-asian-century). This vision was the outcome of more than a year of work by an advisory panel chaired by the former Secretary of the federal Treasury, Ken Henry.
Given the broad sweep of developments across the vast and diverse region that comprises Asia, the document is correspondingly broad-ranging, touching upon everything from the implications of security tensions among emerging powers to the growing people-to-people links that have come about through migration, education links, cultural connections and diplomatic ties. However, not surprising given the composition of the advisory panel and the rapid rise in the economic importance of the region to Australia, the White Paper had a sharp focus on economic developments, business ties and trade relations.
White Papers of this kind are by their nature an attempt to set out a profound shift in long-held assumptions and long-term strategies on a particular topic. In a pragmatic country like Australia, such papers are therefore often criticised for being too “airy fairy” and lacking in specifics and key performance indicators that anyone can measure.
This White Paper was different. It came with a set of 25 “national objectives” and included “pathways” to achieving those objectives. (footnote 2 - http://asiancentury.dpmc.gov.au/white-paper/executive-summary/25-national-objectives) Some of those objectives are inward-looking, that is, what practices Australia needs to adopt internally to be better-prepared for the global transformation that is occuring. These include investing more in world-class infrastructure such as roads and ports and broadband infrastructure; ensuring our education system provides the skills needed to prosper in these changing times; and adopting sound principles of economic management to help our economy continue to be resilient in the face of the uncertainty this transformation is likely to produce.
Other objectives are more outward focussed and consider what can be done to improve Australia’s economic, security and cultural ties with the countries of the region.
What does this mean for business?
Almost inevitably, there have already been rumblings that the Asian Century initiative was too much spin and too little action and that the implementation of the national objectives has been far too slow. (footnote 3 - http://www.smh.com.au/national/asian-century-stillborn-as-activity-stalls-20130222-2ex94.html) Whatever truth there may be to these concerns, it has to be acknowledged that the transformation envisioned in the White Paper is not the stuff of instant gratification. In addition, many of the so-called pathways are an extension of existing government policies and continue to be implemented as such – see for example the continuing focus on improving education standards, rolling out the national broadband network and deepening our ties with China.
It was also explicit in the White Paper that achievement of the vision could not be left to government alone and government departments appear to have been genuine in their commitment to engaging with all sectors of the community.
The latest such initiative relates to the development of individual “country strategies” with the most important countries in the region – China, Japan, India, South Korea and Indonesia. (footnote 4 - http://dfat.gov.au/issues/asian-century/). The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) is seeking input into the drafting of these strategies and is particularly looking to hear about the challenges to trading with, investing in and generally doing business with these countries and any proposals on what can be done to improve relations in these fields.
Dearin & Associates believes that it is vitally important for businesses and anyone else with a stake in these profound developments affecting the future of our country to engage in good faith with this and other opportunities for consultation. If a strong signal is not sent to government that all sectors of the community share in the vision for an Australia better connected to the rapidly-changing world around it, and is willing to do their share in achieving it, then we can hardly be surprised if governments take their eye off the ball. This is especially important with the impending national election. Will future governments continue the momentum for change or will the whole idea quietly fade into memory as governments come and go and short-term political scandals capture the headlines?
How can Dearin & Associates help you engage with the White Paper process?
D&A can help your business bring its perspectives and priorities to the attention of leaders in government.
If your business will be affected by Australia’s developing relationship with Asia, we can help you engage with DFAT in the development of their “country strategies”. We can assist in the preparation of submissions and connect you directly with the key people. If there are things that government can do to assist your business to work with these countries, then this is the opportunity to let them know. Even if you do not have “problems” that need to be resolved, it is important that the government hears about the broad range of businesses that are successfully transforming the way they interact with markets, suppliers and business partners in the region. We particularly encourage small and medium enterprises in emerging sectors to consider engaging in this process to ensure that their views and concerns are not drowned out by bigger companies in traditional sectors.
To talk to us about the various ways in which we can assist your business or industry group to work with government, contact us at (02) 8003 75 83 or at info@dearinassociates.com.

Top 10 Tips for New Exporters by the Australian Institute of Export

  1. Do your research! Don’t build an export strategy into your business plan before you
    know which markets would be suitable markets for the product or service you want to target.
  2. Formulate a basic export strategy which is guided by the knowledge you have gained through research.
  3. Be informed - speak to people who have been there and done that. This involves plugging in to export groups, either online or through various networking events and seminars held by government and industry.  By undertaking your research first and then developing a basic export strategy, you will have a better idea of where your knowledge gaps are and what you need to ask people. 
  4. Consider the appropriate training. Think about who in your company should be trained on export procedures, or whether you may need to recruit someone with experience in the area. There is no such thing as too much knowledge.
  5. Visit your market/s of interest and see first-hand what is happening. If you’re ready, perhaps pre-arrange some business meetings to gauge interest and gain a better understanding of the market.
  6. Don’t forget risk management! Re-visit your export strategy and ensure that you have the appropriate risk management tools in place (IP protection, currency risk hedging etc..)
  7. Prepare your product/service for export. Find out exactly what the requirements are for exporting your good/service. Things like packaging and marketing material may need to be created specifically for your export market. This could involve translation of product and promotional material into the relevant language, and making adjustment as to adhere to customs regulations in that market.
  8. Do your due diligence. When engaging with potential buyers or distributors, at the very least do a basic search to see if they are legitimate and trustworthy.  
  9. Use government and industry association’s services, especially when it comes to being connected with potential buyers/agents/distributors or necessary service providers in your target market. Remember that you can claim legitimate marketing expenses through the EMDG scheme.
  10. Be patient and never give up!
If you are a new exporter and you need assistance in any of the above, then the AIEx can assist you. Established in 1957, the Australian Institute of Export (AIEx) is the education arm of the Export Council of Australia. AIEx collaborates with the export and import community to ensure that Australian companies receive the education and support they need to successfully compete on the international stage.  The AIEx delivers courses and publications on:
  • Export Procedures & Documentation
  • Import Procedures & Documentation
  • Understanding Documentary Credits
  • Online Import and Export courses
  • International Trade Law & IP
  • Accredited Trade Courses
  • Australian Export/ Import Handbooks & International Trade Procedures Guidelines
AIEx possesses a wide range of training modules which allow business to develop in-house training programs in International Trade that fit with their specific needs. 

For further information, please visit: www.aiex.com.au or email education@export.org.au

Monday, April 22, 2013

Adjustments to Growth Forecasts by the WTO


On April 10 the World Trade Organisation (WTO) cut growth projections for 2013 from 4.5 per cent to 3.3 per cent on the back of slow economic growth exhibited by advanced economies, high unemployment figures and the continuing Eurozone crisis. “This year looks to be a near repeat of 2012 with both world trade and output forecast to expand slowly and below historical trends and averages” said Pascal Lamy, Director-General of the WTO, at the recent Trade Negotiation Committee meeting.

Lamy, stressed that while the Governments of developed countries are struggling to find a balance between short-term growth and restrictive fiscal constraints, resorting to protectionist measures is neither a wise nor sustainable course of action. History has very clearly taught us that over the past century.

The WTO’s Ninth Ministerial Conference, which is to be held in Bali in December 2013, is being labelled one of the best opportunities to achieve progress on multilateral trade issues since the troubled Doha negotiations. “Against this uncertain backdrop, the stakes for Bali are high,” Lamy said, “And this is why for the first time since 2008, there is political consensus that the Ministerial meeting in Bali should be about deliverables in trade facilitation, agriculture and S&D/LDC issues.”

Thankfully, longer-term forecasts indicate that stronger growth is expected in 2014, at approximately 5.2 per cent, which is closer to the long-term average.

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Senate Enquiry into 457 visas: What does it mean for Australian exporters?


Author: Cynthia Dearin, Managing Director, Dearin & Associates

Temporary skilled migration into Australia is the hot topic of the moment.

On 23 February, the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, The Hon. Brendan O’Connor MP announced proposed changes to the Subclass 457 Temporary Worker (Skilled) visa program in response to the changing needs of the Australian economy and domestic employment market. 

On 14 March, Prime Minister Julia Gillard gave a speech to the ACTU Community Summit On Creating Secure Jobs And A Better Society, during which she claimed that temporary overseas work was growing much faster than employment was growing and that there was clear evidence that in some growing sectors, importing workers on 457 visas was a substitute for spreading important economic opportunity to Australian working people.

On 20 March, the Senate launched an enquiry into 457 visas and other skilled migration programs.

The proposed changes to the 457 visa scheme have generated concern in the business community, particularly among manufacturers who rely on highly skilled foreign workers to produce the products they export to the rest of the world. 

So what’s it all about?

The Temporary Business (Long Stay) (Subclass 457) visa is one of many of visa categories which are part of the national migration program. It is a temporary visa that allows Australian businesses to sponsor skilled workers to fill vacancies that cannot be filled locally.

Introduced in 1996 by the Coalition government, the 457 visa scheme was designed to respond rapidly to skilled labour shortages identified by employers, by attracting more skilled workers to Australia. The scheme was supposed to give the domestic training system a breathing space to catch up with the demand for qualified employees. The idea was that skills gaps would be plugged with temporary foreign workers while locals were trained to fill the positions in the longer term.

However, as Peter Mares points out in a recent article, things have worked out differently. The 457 visa has expanded into something much more significant – an essential component of a fundamentally changed approach to selecting skilled migrants. Many Australian businesses, including exporters rely on the skills of 457 visa holders to keep their enterprises running.

The 457 visa has a number of major restrictions. It is confined to highly skilled workers and minimum salary requirements apply so that foreign workers cannot be used to undercut Australian workers.  Their stay is restricted to four years, after which time they may apply for permanent residency and eventually, citizenship.

Most 457 visa holders are professionals or technicians and trade workers, taking up jobs in sectors like construction, health care, IT and other services around the country. A significant number also work in the manufacturing sector, in companies that export their products abroad. The scheme has been especially effective in recruiting skilled workers to regional and remote areas where there has been great difficulty in recruiting Australians, especially in medical services, engineering and specialised skilled trades.

What changes are proposed to the 457 scheme?

Last month, Minister O'Connor indicated that the proposed changes to the 457 scheme would include:

An obligation on employers to demonstrate that they are not nominating positions where a genuine shortage does not exist – this may indicate a strengthening of the current requirement to show that the position is genuine.

  • Stricter English language requirements for certain positions in line with the English language thresholds for permanent employer sponsored visas such as the Subclass 186 Employer Nomination Scheme Visa. 
  • Improved enforceability of existing training requirements for employers that use the program and further strengthening of the current sponsorship obligations to ensure that the working conditions of 457 workers are in line with Australian standards.
  • Increase in the market salary exemption from $180 000 to $250 000 - currently, employers are not required to demonstrate that they are paying ‘market rate’ for positions offering $180,000 per annum or more.
  • On-hire arrangements of 457 visa workers to be restricted.
  • Strengthening of compliance and enforcement powers to deter employers who have routinely abused the system.
  • Stakeholder consultation to ensure market rate provisions more effectively protect local employment.


In the media release announcing the changes, the Minister said that while the 457 scheme played a vital role in ensuring that Australian businesses were able to source the skilled workers they needed where they were unable to find suitably skilled labour in the domestic employment market, it had become clear that the growth in the scheme was out of step with current skills shortages. He went on to say that the government had evidence that some employers were using 457 visas to discriminate against locals. 

The proposed changes are expected to come into effect on 1 July 2013 with further details to be released before this date.

What is the purpose of the Senate Enquiry?

The purpose of the Senate Enquiry is to seek a range of views on the 457  (and similar) visa schemes and the proposed changes to them. The Enquiry’s Terms of Reference are broad and include an examination of:


  • The effectiveness of 457 visas in filling areas of identified skill shortages and the extent to which they may result in a decline in Australia's national training effort, with particular reference to apprenticeships; 
  • The accessibility of 457 visas and the criteria against which applications are assessed, including whether stringent labour market testing can or should be applied to the application process; 
  • The process of granting 457 visas and the monitoring of these processes;
  • The adequacy of the tests that apply to the granting of 457 visas and their impact on local employment opportunities; 
  • The economic benefits of the 457 and related schemes and the economic and social impact of such agreements; 
  • Whether better long-term forecasting of workforce needs, and the associated skills training required, would reduce the extent of the current reliance on such visas; 
  • The impact of the recent changes announced by the Government on the above points; 


Complete Terms of Reference are available here:
http://aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate_Committees?url=legcon_ctte/457_visas/info.htm
and submissions should be received by 26 April 2013. The reporting date is 03 June 2013.

What does this mean for Australian exporters?

The proposed reforms announced by Mr O’Connor and subsequent enquiry have prompted a wide-ranging debate about whether changes to the 457 visa are warranted and what their impact on Australian business is likely to be. Business groups and private enterprise have spoken out strongly in favour of the existing 457 visa scheme. 

Mr Ian Murray, Executive Director of the Export Council of Australia says “research clearly shows that Australia’s International competitiveness has declined in recent years. The high dollar, high labour costs and high interest rates have all contributed to this. In the manufacturing and IT sectors Australia as an exporter competes at the premium end where high level skills are an absolute necessity.”

Evidence clearly shows that without the support of the 457 Visa program the IT export sector, a shining light in Australia’s recent export performance, would simply not have occurred. Mr. Murray said  “The reasons behind making these changes now, when the export sector, is struggling, is difficult to comprehend. Australia is going to fall behind internationally as a result and the opportunity to capture the innovation that comes with the development of these industries will never be realised.”

Mr Innes Wilcox, CEO of the Australian Industry Group has queried the Prime Minister’s assertion that temporary overseas work is growing much faster than employment is growing or that there is clear evidence that in some growing sectors, importing workers on 457 visas is a substitute for spreading important economic opportunity to Australian working people.

Mr Wilcox points out that much has been made of the purported growth of 457 visa holders in a slowing economy and argues that in this economic climate the number of applications from employers should have fallen, not risen. He says that in fact that is exactly what has happened, citing a recent Department of Immigration and Citizenship report which states that the number of subclass 457 primary visa applications continued to decline in January 2013, having declined for five consecutive 
months.

Business Council of Australia Chief Executive Ms Jennifer Westacott has said that the proposed changes to 457 visa arrangements are a classic regulatory overreach that risks damaging the competitiveness and viability of important projects and businesses.



“Less than a month after the Department of Immigration reported that the 457 visa program was responding well to economic needs and demand was declining in recent months the minister has claimed the program was being abused by some employers at the expense of local jobs,” Ms Westacott said.

Holding Redlich partner Maria Jockel has described its recent politicisation of the 457 scheme and the move to further tighten visa requirements as a worrying concern for individuals and employers who rely on the 457 visa. 

ANU demographer, Peter McDonald, has questioned whether tightening of the rules is really necessary, estimating that only ‘about 2 or 3 per cent of employers’ are ‘rorting’ the system. 

Individual exporters have also expressed concern about that restrictions to the 457 scheme would negatively affect their businesses.

Inflatable Packers International commercial director Howard Kenworthy said his company had for years hired a combination of local tradesmen, local apprentices and 457 visa workers as well as working holiday visa holders.

"It's pretty tough in WA being a manufacturer trying to export and you need a first class team to survive. Good 457 employees are a very necessary part of that team," Mr Kenworthy said.

Mr Kenworthy pointed out that although the company always tried first to recruit locally, in 2012 it managed to hire one local tradesman. Two of the firm's 26 Perth employees are on 457 visas.

The Department of Immigration and Citizenship has said that the reforms will not adversely affect the vast majority of employers who are using the program appropriately.  Nonetheless, it is clear that employers will be expected to meet higher benchmarks in order to sponsor foreign workers in future.

On the other side of the coin, unions have made strong calls for the scheme to be heavily modified or scrapped altogether.

The Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) is campaigning against the 457 scheme, which it describes as a disgraceful abuse of overseas workers and a means for employers to drive down wages and conditions in Australia.

The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) says that workers on 457 visas have been underpaid, abused and subjected to sub-standard conditions of work. The union claims that most cases of abuse have tended to involve trades level 457 visa holders with little or no English language skills who often lacked the technical skills they were supposed to have to be eligible for a 457 visa. 

At the same time, the ACTU says that the 457 visa program has undermined the Australian labour market by enabling employers who are unable to attract local labour as a result of offering poor wages and conditions, or who are unwilling to train workers in areas of skills needs, to sponsor workers from overseas. 

Others argue that the scheme is not tough enough in spite of significant amendments to the program in 2009. In a paper published in November 2012 by the Centre for Population and Urban Research at Monash University, the authors noted that while labour market testing may be expensive and hard to enforce, there is a need to better protect domestic workers from foreign competition. 


Getting involved in the Parliamentary process

Are you part of a business that utilises the 457 scheme? Would you like to ensure that your business is not affected by proposed changes to the scheme and that your access to skilled workers is not restricted? 

Or would your firm like to suggest ways in which the regulatory burden of the 457 process could be alleviated? 

Perhaps you own a business that is negatively affected by rorting or overuse of the program by your competitors.

If would you like to make a submission to the Senate Enquiry or have your views heard by Government, Dearin & Associates can help to bring your views to the decision makers in the most effective way. Contact us today to find out how we can assist you.

Sources

1. Chowdhury, Rita and Healey, Samantha. “Proposed changes – Subclass 457 visa – temporary work (skilled) program”. Lexology. 5 March 2013. (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6596348c-c35b-490a-98a4-3052196f369c).

2. Clancy, Ray. “Data backs up growth in 457 visa programme”. AustraliaForum.com. 12 March 2013. (http://www.australiaforum.com/information/immigration/data-backs-up-growth-in-457-visa-programme.html).

3. Clancy, Ray. “Poll backs changes to Australia 457 visa programme”. AustraliaForum.com. 22 March 2013. (http://www.australiaforum.com/information/jobs/poll-backs-changes-to-australia-457-visa-programme.html).

4. Gillard, Julia MP, Prime Minister. “Address To The ACTU Community Summit On Creating Secure Jobs And A Better Society”. Prime Minister of Australia Press Office. Thursday,  14 March 2013. (http://www.pm.gov.au/press-office/address-actu-community-summit-creating-secure-jobs-and-better-society).

5. Hugo, Graham. “Explainer: 457 Visas in Australia”. The Conversation. 14 March 2013, 9.56am AEST. (http://theconversation.com/explainer-457-visas-in-australia-12622).

6. Mares, Peter. “Temporary migration is a permanent thing”. Inside Story: Current affairs and culture from Australia and beyond. 26 March 2013. (http://inside.org.au/temporary-migration-is-a-permanent-thing/).

7. O’Connor, Brendan MP, Minister for Immigration and Citizenship. “Reforms to the temporary work (skilled) (subclass 457) program”. Brendan O’Connor, MP, Minister for Immigration and Citizenship. 23 February 2013. (http://www.minister.immi.gov.au/media/bo/2013/bo193683.htm),

8. Phillips, Janet. “Temporary skilled migration and the 457 visa”. FlagPost: Information and Research from Australia’s Commonwealth Parliamentary Library. 13 March 2013. (http://parliamentflagpost.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/temporary-skilled-migration-and-457-visa.html).

9. Phillips, Melissa. “How low can they go?”. On Line Opinion: Australia’s e-journal of social and political debate. 14 March 2013. (http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=14795).

10. Quine, Stephanie. “Lawyer slams tightening of 457 visa program”. Lawyers Weekly. 14 March 2013. (http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/lawyer-slams-tightening-of-457-visa-program).

11. Talor, Paige. “We're different in the west, Colin Barnett tells PM”. The Australian. 28 March 2013. (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/were-different-in-the-west-colin-barnett-tells-pm/story-e6frgczx-1226608003291).

12. Thompson, Scott. “Red Tape Not the Answer on Skills”. Business Council of Australia. 23 February 2013. (http://www.bca.com.au/Content/102096.aspx).

13. Wilcox, Innes. “The debate over 457 visas has reached the bottom of the barrel”. Manufacturers’ Monthly. 15 March, 2013. (http://www.manmonthly.com.au/features/the-debate-over-457-visas-has-reached-the-bottom-o).

14. Williams, Dan and Arends, Megan. “'Fair go' for local workers - changes to the Subclass 457 temporary work visa program”. Lexology.  25 February 2013. (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=5c1e0638-66e1-4fb2-906f-eecf71bd74dc).

15. “Stop visa 457 exploitation”. AMWU Campaigns. Accessed 26 March 2013. (http://www.amwu.org.au/campaigns/4/457-VISA-EXPLOITATION/).

16. “Temporary overseas workers”. Australian Council of Trade Unions. Accessed 26 March 2013. (http://www.actu.org.au/Issues/OverseasWorkers/default.aspx).

Monday, April 1, 2013

McGrathNicol - Year in Review 2012


Year in Review 2012 

1  Bribery and corruption

In 2012, Australia saw the first conviction under Australia’s Crimes Act for bribery related matters. However, an OECD report issued in October 2012 gave Australia a poor rating with regard to the levels of enforcement activity and the investigation of alleged corrupt conduct. This has increased the pressure on Australian regulatory authorities to review prosecution practices. In response, the Australian Federal Police announced in January 2013 that it will reopen several bribery and corruption cases.

The investigations of Morgan Stanley and Hercules Offshore by US authorities during 2012 have revealed the benefits to businesses of investing in robust anti-corruption compliance and training programs. US Federal authorities decided not to pursue enforcement action against both companies for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act on the basis of their strong internal control systems, amongst other things. From our experience in West Africa, the Middle East and Asia Pacific we note that the tone set by local management is a critical element in tackling the inherent bribery and corruption risk associated with operating in a high risk country.
Read more in the article:  Anti-bribery and corruption – How effective is your program? Our overseas experience

2  Investigations - risky business

In 2011, the UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO) conducted a raid on the homes of entrepreneurs, Vincent and Robert Tchenguiz, in response to the alleged funnelling of monies from an Icelandic bank only months before it collapsed. In 2012, the charges against them were dropped after it was found the SFO relied, in part, on unverified information and presented incorrect information to the UK High Court.

The Tchenguiz example highlights that even experienced investigators and legal advisors need to be cognisant of the risks associated with conducting investigations.
Read more about the tips to consider when undertaking an investigation in the article: Investigations – risky business

3  How comfortable is today’s Boardroom?

In recent times, we have seen several themes occupying an increasing amount of time on the agendas of Boards including:
+     the tone at the top - how management’s attitude and beliefs may impact on employees’ ethics and integrity;
+     risk appetite - why front line businesses need to understand their accountabilities and be supported by effective and commercial assurance solutions; and
+     corporate governance - do risk and assurance teams have clearly articulated plans and execution strategies?

How comfortable are you that the bases are covered and that all information, including the bad news, is making its way into the Boardroom? 
Read more about what actions you can take in the article:How comfortable is today’s Boardroom?

4  Risk management - volatility, uncertainty, and regulation

In 2012, further intensification of the European debt crisis and rising concerns in relation to the US “fiscal cliff” weighed on the minds of Directors and Senior Executives. Most of them recognise that world markets are likely to remain volatile, with low growth and tighter credit markets. These issues, together with increasing regulation and regulatory scrutiny, as well as greater activity from hungry class action lawyers, have refocused Directors’ attention on their ever growing obligations.

Read more about the challenges facing Australian Board members in relation to: market volatility and uncertainty; low or negative growth; access to finance markets; and increasing regulation and regulatory scrutiny in the article: Volatility, uncertainty and regulation.

5  How risk can be mitigated in the Cloud

The trend of companies moving IT processing and storage to the Cloud is growing rapidly and organisations need to give due and proper consideration to the legal, privacy and security implications of this change in the IT service model.

Rapid growth in the Cloud computing industry has resulted in more providers to choose from. The quality of service and infrastructure offered by a provider could have profound risks to the security and accessibility of your data.
Read more about possible pitfalls with storing data in the Cloud in the article: How can risk be mitigated in the Cloud?